Hijacked Again!

OK, New Hampshire - this is your chance. You can look into - and rectify - the confirmed election fraud in the Jan. Eight primary election - or accept your portion in the straight-out larceny which completely disreputes the 2008 election.

I just read a news study from New Seeland describing New Hampshire as the first in the state with corporate controlled secret ballot counting. And the New Hampshire primary as all Diebold, all the time. New Zealand! Can't maintain a secret anymore.

They're wrong. Only 81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted by the rigged Diebold ocular scanners.

But the point, of course, is clear. We are the riant stock of the human race - the dissemblers who deplore other states elections as not meeting the criteria of our bogus democracy. A democracy that is now about as existent as the mythical Al-Qaeda concealment under every bush.

The talking television caputs were a sight to behold, pretending a befuddled astonishment at the miraculous turn of events. How could such as a thing happen? Polls all twenty-four hours predicted Obama as victor by a immense margin. Poor Hillary. She might have got to borrow bus fare just to acquire home.

Then the polls closed, and an astonishing thing happened: suddenly, it was too fold to call. State what? How could this happen? How could Edmund Hillary bend licking into victory? A dedicated militarist guaranteeing ageless warfare - winning in the Live Free or Die state of New Hampshire?

Ah, but the account is simple: the polls were off. The polls were off! Somehow, for some weird, unexplained reason, all the Democrats who were going to vote for Obama lied to their pollsters. They just decided, at the last minute, to give their ballots to Hillary. Sounds logical to me.

This antic account was given with consecutive human faces and great hilarity by every talking head. Russert - almost drooling over himself with excitement. Matthews. Scarborough. Olbermann. Etc., etc., advertisement nauseum.

No account was given for the fact that every other opinion poll was right on the money. Only Obama protagonists apparently lied to their pollsters. Who could have got known? The talking caputs apparently knew - and I have got lost regard for every 1 of them.

How stupid make they believe we are? Stupid indeed, and a mulct testament to our declining educational system. Accept their childish accounts without inquiry and you corroborate your rank in a Sheeple society that necessitates close supervising for its ain protection. Or not. Maybe it's just a inquiry of enlightenment. And acknowledgment that it's past clip for the villagers to revolt.

Some television newsreaders claim it was Hillary's teary-eyed performance in a New Hampshire diner that did the trick. Unlikely. Edmund Hillary is an complete actress, but she's not that good. Another phantasy of misdirection.

The polls are always presumed to be wrong, but never the results. Polls taken before the election showed Obama up by 10 to 15 points over Hillary. Then, the cryptic Edmund Hillary rush screening her whipping Obama by 39.4 percentage to 36.8 percent. Isn't it interesting, that those same approximative percents pertained throughout.

Votes counted on Diebold machines showed Edmund Hillary with a concluding run of 39.6 percentage and Obama with 36.3 percent. Hand-counted ballots showed a pronounced difference: Obama winning with 38.6 percentage and Edmund Hillary with 34.9 percent. Based on manus numeration throughout, Obama would have got won by over 10,000 votes. There's more than a small guess as to why he was so speedy to profess defeat.

81% of New Hampshire ballots were counted in secret by Prime Minister Election Solutions, a private company formerly known as Diebold Election Systems. The machines are programmed by Bay State based luteinizing hormones Associates owned by Toilet Silvestro, centre of a public difference regarding the hackability of his machines.

Next to nil is really known about the Diebold machine programmers. Or luteinizing hormones Associates. Or the secret vote-counting software system used to run our ballots. We are expected to blindly accept the secret determinations that control almost every facet of our lives - like most authorities declarations that day-to-day corroborate the fact that we are the lone so-called "democracy" that makes not stand for the involvements of the self-satisfied citizens under its control.

What is known is that LHS, a private company, will number most of the New Hampshire ballot with no inadvertence at all. They command the memory cards, machine fix and substitution - even on election day, when they usually malfunction - and they are responsible to no one.

What is also known is that the Diebold vote machines can easily be hacked - in less than a minute - by anyone with minimum scheduling skills. Did Obama actually win in New Hampshire? Did Edmund Hillary lose? Rich Person we just witnessed another lawsuit of election fraud - another purloined election?

One lawsuit of absolutely confirmed election fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire where electors project 31 ballots for Bokkos Alice Paul - and the town recorded zero. Zero! Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton, confirmed that the 31 figure sum for Bokkos Alice Paul was left off the run sheet - owed to human error.

The most common fraud in a manus count system is to change or exclude consequences on a coverage sheet. A absorbing dexterity of hand. Complete a well-witnessed rapprochement sheet, then present an altered summary.

Ron Alice Paul was completely denied all of his ballots in this 1 community. When the Sutton ballot larceny became public, other districts, such as as Greenville, suddenly changed their concluding ballot runs for Bokkos Paul, from zero to existent ballots received. I inquire how many similar incidents have got yet to be discovered.

Ron Alice Paul was expected to take 3rd place, owed to his polling at 14% prior to the election. His coating with just 8%, A 6% disagreement from pre-polling forecasts, should be clear cogent evidence in and of itself of intentional election fraud.

It have been suggested that Mr. Alice Paul demand a recount. But Dennis Kucinich have already made the request, paying the $2,000 fee out of his ain pocket to begin the process. Recounts, of course, present their ain problems. I remember the Buckeye State election of 2004. Two election functionaries were convicted of rigging the recount of their rigged election.

Another country of critical importance in any recount concerns the concatenation of custody. This affects ballot inventories, substitutions, other ballots, removal, stuffing, printing, etc., etc. Many things besides just a physical recount and comparing of results.

Remember also the 2004 Nader recount. Only 11 territories were counted - selected by a individual of questionable motive and fictional character - and nil out of the ordinary was revealed. That questionable "recount" validated the machines, discrediting the campaigner devising the request.

The recount should continue without additional delay. Already, too much clip have passed. The 31 Sutton occupants - and others - should be persuaded to voice their indignation at being disenfranchised on every national and international forum that volition listen to them.

Ron Paul, of course, is the great enemy of the totalitarian empire we've become, and the rule victim of the establishment's attempts to discredit, marginalize and get rid of him. This can't be allowed to happen.

I would propose that Mr. Paul's political campaign might see enlisting the aid of American servicemen to guarantee the remaining elections are aboveboard. Perhaps some of the 200,000 homeless person veteran soldiers ignored and discarded by their lying government. They could cover every election, interview voters, record every facet they could of the whole procedure - forestall any ballot use where possible. Manage any bullying from Hillary's or any other campaign. I'm certain there would be no deficiency of volunteers.

Ron Alice Paul is truly our last hope. The lone 1s against him are our ain corporate, particular interest, fascistic authorities and completely controlled mainstream mass media - all of whom acknowledge the very existent possibilities of losing their imperial, entrenched powers.

They will make everything in their powerfulness to halt him. We must make everything we can to protect him and the motion he represents. This time, we must make all we can to guarantee honorable elections. This could very well be our last opportunity.

There is a wealthiness of grounds not presented here - things like an unreasonable surplus of ballots - the appellation of "other" on campaigner selection, no uncertainty representing stolen Bokkos Alice Paul ballots - the declaration by respective webs of McCain as winner, just 17 proceedings after the polls closed. With just a few precincts making their clairvoyant projections, it's all over. No demand to number the majority of the ballots. The charming machines cognize the replies in advance. What a travesty. What a joke. What an absolute disgrace.

This is an election worth combat for, because of the echt chance represented by Bokkos Paul. Since the warnings about Diebold have got got been ignored for so long, I have small religion that they will go small more than than a minor concern now.

Which intends you can experience free to see every facet of this so-called "election" as merely entertainment. Go ahead. Elect the campaigner of "your choice" - and ticker your hereafter disappear. Your pick have got been selected for you, and you have no choice. Bad about that.

I really believe it's too late. The dice is cast. Maybe "your" campaigner can make something about the devastation of the dollar - or the billions soon to be stateless and idle and maybe fighting for nutrient - or the obscene, astronomical debt we have got inflicted on untold coevals - or the depression on our doorsill - or ageless war. Or any of a million other things designed to destruct your freedoms, if not your lives.

All of which, perhaps, may be just a small extreme. I be given to acquire carried away once in awhile. Things are probably not as bad as I do them out to be. On the other hand, they might be worse. The best advice I can probably give is to propose that you ignore everything you've read so far. Just the ranting and raving mad of person who sees indifference turning into destruction.

Just maintain a low profile and travel with the flow. Decisions as to what's outdo for you will soon be taken out of your hands. In the meantime, bask the show.